The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mixed Swarms of the Molecular M and S Forms of Anopheles gambiae (Diptera: Culicidae) in Sympatric Area from Burkina Faso
Open accessAbstract
The M and S molecular forms of Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto Giles are thought to be reproductively isolated through premating barriers. However, the exact mechanisms of recognition of conspecific partners are unknown. Because mating in An. gambiae occurs in swarms, one might expect swarming behavior between the M and S forms to be different and that this probably reduces the risk of contact between males and females of the different forms in areas where they are sympatric. We report the occurrence of four mixed swarms, containing males of M and S forms, out of a total of 26 swarms sampled in Soumousso, a typical savannah village of Burkina Faso, West Africa. However, the frequency of mixed swarms was lower than that expected by chance. This observation suggests partial segregation between the swarms of the molecular forms, which may contribute to their isolation. Because the frequency of mixed swarms seems too high to explain the low frequency of cross-mating and hybrids, we suggest that mate recognition in a swarm is more important than swarm segregation.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The form composition in 26 swarms in Burkina Faso where the forms are sympatric revealed that males of both molecular forms were present in only four swarms (Diabate et al. 2006).”
From The molecular forms of Anopheles gambiae: a phenotypic perspective (2008) · cites this paper as Diabate et al. 2006
In the citing paper
“This level of mixed swarms was considerably lower than that expected by chance based on the form composition indoors during the same time.”
From The molecular forms of Anopheles gambiae: a phenotypic perspective (2008) · cites this paper as Diabate et al. 2006
Citations
Cites
The Biology of Mosquitoes, Volume 2: Sensory Reception and Behaviour
Clements, A. N. (1999) · CABI eBooks · doi:10.1079/9780851993133.0000 · Cited by 513
A Polytene Chromosome Analysis of the Anopheles gambiae Species Complex
Coluzzi, M., Sabatini, A., della Torre, A., Di Deco, M. A., & Petrarca, V. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1077769 · Cited by 447
Molecular evidence of incipient speciation within Anopheles gambiae s.s. in West Africa
Torre, A. D., Fanello, C., Akogbeto, M., Dossou‐yovo, J., Favia, G., Petrarca, V., & Coluzzi, M. (2001) · Insect Molecular Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2583.2001.00235.x · Cited by 316
Chromosomal inversion intergradation and incipient speciation in Anopheles gambiae
Coluzzi, M., Petrarca, V., & di Deco, M. A. (1985) · Bolletino di zoologia · doi:10.1080/11250008509440343 · Cited by 312
(1998) · PubMed · Cited by 296
Favia, G., Lanfrancotti, A., Spanos, L., Sidén‐Kiamos, I., & Louis, C. (2001) · Insect Molecular Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2583.2001.00236.x · Cited by 278
Speciation Within Anopheles gambiae -- the Glass Is Half Full
della Torre, A., Costantini, C., Besansky, N. J., Caccone, A., Petrarca, V., Powell, J. R., & Coluzzi, M. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1078170 · Cited by 229
Tripet, F., Touré, Y. T., Taylor, C. E., Norris, D. E., Dolo, G., & Lanzaro, G. C. (2001) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.0962-1083.2001.01301.x · Cited by 178
Diabaté, A., Brengues, C., Baldet, T., Dabiré, R. K., Hougard, J.-M., Akogbeto, M. C., Kengne, P., Simard, F., Guillet, P., Hemingway, J., et al. (2004) · Tropical Medicine & International Health · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3156.2004.01336.x · Cited by 148
Self-citationMating behaviour in the mosquito, Anopheles gambiae s.1.save
Charlwood, J. D., & JONES, M. D. R. (1979) · Physiological Entomology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3032.1979.tb00185.x · Cited by 143
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Widespread Divergence Between Incipient Anopheles gambiae Species Revealed by Whole Genome Sequences
Lawniczak, M., Emrich, S., Holloway, A. K., Regier, A. P., Olson, M., White, B. J., Redmond, S. N., Fulton, L., Appelbaum, E. L., Godfrey, J., et al. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1195755 · Cited by 261
Costantini, C., Ayala, D., Guelbeogo, M. W., Pombi, M., Some, C. Y. S., Bassolé, I. H. N., Osé, K., Fotsing, J.-M., Sagnon, N., Fontenille, D., et al. (2009) · BMC Ecology · doi:10.1186/1472-6785-9-16 · Cited by 222
Self-citationPennetier, C., Warren, B., Dabiré, R. K., Russell, I. J., & Gibson, G. (2010) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.11.040 · Cited by 200
Evidence of natural Wolbachia infections in field populations of Anopheles gambiae
Baldini, F., Segata, N., Pompon, J., Marcenac, P., Shaw, W. R., Dabiré, R. K., Diabaté, A., Levashina, E. A., & Catteruccia, F. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms4985 · Cited by 189
Self-citationThe molecular forms of Anopheles gambiae: a phenotypic perspective
Lehmann, T., & Diabate, A. (2008) · Infection, Genetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2008.06.003 · Cited by 177
“Females fly into rms and depart paired with a male (Charlwood and Jones, 0; Charlwood et al., 2002; Diabate et al., 2006; Marchand, 4).”
InfluentialSelf-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Diabaté, A., Dabire, R. K., Kengne, P., Brengues, C., Baldet, T., Ouari, A., Simard, F., & Lehmann, T.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR)
- Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (FR)
- Centre Muraz (BF)
- Venue
- Journal of Medical Entomology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-05-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 480-483
- ISSN
- 0022-2585 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2241817335
- Cited by
- 84
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 4.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- Journal of Medical Entomology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Journal of Medical Entomology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
- Agritrop (Cirad) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Funders
- UNICEF
- National Institutes of Health
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Diptera species taxonomy and behavior
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Keywords
- Anopheles gambiae, M and S molecular forms, swarming, premating isolation, mate recognition, reproductive isolation, sympatric populations, hybridization, mosquito mating behavior
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Anopheles, Behavior, Animal, Burkina Faso, Female, Male, Population Density
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review